Home Car/Bike Reviews 2013 Mitsubishi Lancer GT AWD

2013 Mitsubishi Lancer GT AWD

381
0

 

In the compact sedan market, top spot has been dominated by the Honda Civic for…well, almost forever. It is, after all, the most popular car sold in Canada and people buy it in droves. And whatever crumbs are left over are taken up by the Toyota Corolla, Ford Fiesta, Mazda3 and so on. This is a fiercely competitive market and any carmaker wanting in on the action had better bring their A game.

Mitsubishi has done this with its Lancer sedan. Hardly more than a blip on the screen, the Lancer is every bit as good as a Civic, Corolla or any of the rest. In fact, in some respects, it’s better.

Available in six different trim levels, with a range of drivetrain choices, the Lancer is priced competitively ($15,498 to start, before extras), and actually comes with a slightly more powerful base engine than the Civic. The standard equipment level is comparable, and so are the interior dimensions: the Civic has 2678 litres of passenger volume, while the Lancer is good for 2648; and trunk space is 348 litres versus 353 litres. So, slight edge to the Civic here, but not by much.

But what the Lancer does offer that you can’t get with a Civic is all-wheel-drive. Available with the SE and GT versions, this gives the Lancer an additional dimension of performance and is unusual in this end of the market.

My test Lancer, a GT AWC version, had this feature, and while I didn’t use it, I loved the fact that it was there, just the same. And this is not just your run-of-the-mill AWD system that cuts in when the weather changes. There are actually three settings: 2WD, 4WD Auto, and 4WD Lock, which means that theoretically at least, the Lancer AWC could handle some pretty nasty terrain, if it had to.

It also comes with a larger engine; the base powerplant is a 2.0 litre that develops 148 horsepower, while the AWD versions are fitted with a 2.4 litre that develops 168 horsepower. Again, an extra dose of performance. The downside is that you can only get a CVT with the larger engine….regrettable. And, of course, fuel economy is affected; the AWD version is considerably thirstier….especially on the highway. Natural Resources Canada tells us that fuel costs for a year for the GT AWC would be $2116, compared to $1806 for a FWD with a manual transmission. The Civic? About $1600, equipped with the five-speed automatic.

Having AWD also bumps the price tag up considerably….the GT AWC starts at just under $28,000, but you get a full complement of features and modcons. For example, a climate control system, heated front seats, Sirius satellite radio, leather upholstery, a power sunroof and so on. Think of the Acura CSX in terms of interior accoutrements.

The Lancer also has something else the Civic lacks: peace and quiet. Honda has made some good progress stifling NVH volume levels with the Civic, but it is still a comparatively loud car on the highway. The Lancer is much more placid inside and assembly quality seems to be superior. Much as I like the Civic, the Lancer has a more substantial feel to it and belies its relatively humble status in the marketplace. It feels more upscale than it is.

That said, it needs a facelift….badly. This body style is getting a little long in the tooth, and in the car business, time stands still for nobody. Check out the sleek styling of the Civic, Hyundai Elantra, and Ford Fiesta, for example, and the Lancer is looking pretty frumpy in comparison. And sticking a cheesey spoiler onto the rear deck doesn’t help things.

And a word about the CVT. In this application, it seems to be better behaved than others I’ve driven lately. I remain a non-believer as far as this snowmobile-inspired transmission is concerned. Most of the time, it’s snatchy, and unpredictable, but in the Lancer GT, it seems to be a reasonably food fit. Carmakers swear up and down that manufacturing costs are not a factor when it comes to a CVT vs. a conventional planetary gearbox, and fuel economy is the number one consideration, but I don’t believe a word of it. The Civic has a five-speed automatic and its fuel economy is actually superior to the Lancer with a CVT. So there.

But Mitsubishi’s challenge with the Lancer is not what kind of transmission to use or how to improve its looks, but how to get the public to sit up and take notice. Honda sold almost 50,000 Civics in Canada last year, and its sales numbers are actually increasing. The Lancer, meanwhile, isn’t even on the board, and doesn’t make the Top Ten.

It deserves better.

 

AT A GLANCE

Base Price: $27,998; as tested: $29,345

Engine:  2.4 litre four cylinder

Horsepower: 168 hp @ 6000 rpm

Torque: 167 ft. lb. @ 4100 rpm

Transmission: CVT

Drive: FWD/AWD 

Fuel economy: (litres/100 km): 9.2 city; 6.9 hwy.  Regular gas.

Alternatives: Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Hyundai Elantra, Nissan Sentra, Ford Fiesta, Mazda3, Subaru Impreza, Chev Cruze, VW Jetta, VW Golf, Kia Rio.